-
Articles_of_he_Bishop_of_Uramiah, page : 48
foretold in the two biblical documents above mentioned,
Prophet Muhammad, and not Prophet Jesus, is intended the
following arguments must surely suffice to convince every
impartial observer:-
1. The kinship, the relation and resemblance between
11
the two tetrograms Himda and Ahmd, and the identity of
the root hmd from which both substantives are derived, leave
not a single particle of doubt that the subject in the sentence
"and the Himda of all nations will come" is Ahmed; that is
to say, Muhammad. There is not the remotest etymological
connection between himda and any other names of "Jesus,"
"Christ," "Savior," not even a single consonant in common
Prophet Muhammad, and not Prophet Jesus, is intended the
following arguments must surely suffice to convince every
impartial observer:-
1. The kinship, the relation and resemblance between
11
the two tetrograms Himda and Ahmd, and the identity of
the root hmd from which both substantives are derived, leave
not a single particle of doubt that the subject in the sentence
"and the Himda of all nations will come" is Ahmed; that is
to say, Muhammad. There is not the remotest etymological
connection between himda and any other names of "Jesus,"
"Christ," "Savior," not even a single consonant in common