-
Articles_of_he_Bishop_of_Uramiah, page : 466
Mary." He could not call himself "the son of man" because
he was only "the son of woman." There is no getting away
from the fact. You may make him "the son of God" as
you do, but you can't make him "the son of man"
unless you believe him to be the offspring of Joseph or
someone else, and consequently fasten on to him the taint
of illegitimacy.
I don't know exactly how, whether through intuition,
inspiration, or dream, I am taught and convinced that the
second name in the formula is an ill-fated corruption of
"the Son of Man," viz. the Barnasha of Daniel (vii.), and
therefore Ahmad "the Periqlytos" (Paraclete) of St. John's
Gospel.
As to the Holy Spirit in the formula, it is not a person
he was only "the son of woman." There is no getting away
from the fact. You may make him "the son of God" as
you do, but you can't make him "the son of man"
unless you believe him to be the offspring of Joseph or
someone else, and consequently fasten on to him the taint
of illegitimacy.
I don't know exactly how, whether through intuition,
inspiration, or dream, I am taught and convinced that the
second name in the formula is an ill-fated corruption of
"the Son of Man," viz. the Barnasha of Daniel (vii.), and
therefore Ahmad "the Periqlytos" (Paraclete) of St. John's
Gospel.
As to the Holy Spirit in the formula, it is not a person