-
Articles_of_he_Bishop_of_Uramiah, page : 542
In the most coherent and significant passages in the
discourses of Jesus where the appellation "Barnasha" -
or "the Son of Man" - appears, only Prophet Muhammad is in-
tended, and in him alone the prediction contained therein
is literally fulfilled. In some passages wherein Jesus
125
is supposed to have assumed that title for himself, that
passage becomes incoherent, senseless, and extremely
obscure. Take for instance the following passages: "The
Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they said, Be-
hold." (1) John-Baptist was a teetotaler, he fed himself
only on water, locusts, and wild honey; they said he was a
demoniac; but "the Son of Man," id est Jesus (?), who ate
and drank wine, was branded as "the friend of publicans
discourses of Jesus where the appellation "Barnasha" -
or "the Son of Man" - appears, only Prophet Muhammad is in-
tended, and in him alone the prediction contained therein
is literally fulfilled. In some passages wherein Jesus
125
is supposed to have assumed that title for himself, that
passage becomes incoherent, senseless, and extremely
obscure. Take for instance the following passages: "The
Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they said, Be-
hold." (1) John-Baptist was a teetotaler, he fed himself
only on water, locusts, and wild honey; they said he was a
demoniac; but "the Son of Man," id est Jesus (?), who ate
and drank wine, was branded as "the friend of publicans