-
TheGreatDebateOrRevealingTheTruth, page : 97
writers are unanimous on the point that the Gospel of Matthew
was originally in the Hebrew language and has been completely
obscured due to distortions and alterations made by the Christians.
The present Gospel is merely a translation and is not supported by
any ARGUMENT or authority. Even the name of its translator is not
definitely known. There are only conjectures that possibly this or
that person might have translated it. This kind of ARGUMENT cannot
be acceptable to a non-Christian reader. The book cannot be
attributed to its author only on the basis of uncertain
calculations.
2 The Christian author of Meezan-ul-Haq could not produce any
authority regarding the author of this book. He only conjectured
and said that Matthew might possibly have written it in the Greek
language. In view of this fact this translation is not acceptable
and is liable to be rejected.
3 The Penny Encyclopedia says regarding the Gospel of
was originally in the Hebrew language and has been completely
obscured due to distortions and alterations made by the Christians.
The present Gospel is merely a translation and is not supported by
any ARGUMENT or authority. Even the name of its translator is not
definitely known. There are only conjectures that possibly this or
that person might have translated it. This kind of ARGUMENT cannot
be acceptable to a non-Christian reader. The book cannot be
attributed to its author only on the basis of uncertain
calculations.
2 The Christian author of Meezan-ul-Haq could not produce any
authority regarding the author of this book. He only conjectured
and said that Matthew might possibly have written it in the Greek
language. In view of this fact this translation is not acceptable
and is liable to be rejected.
3 The Penny Encyclopedia says regarding the Gospel of