-
TheGreatDebateOrRevealingTheTruth, page : 117
9 The Catholic Herald (1844) contains the following statement
on page 206 of vol. 7: "Rose has written on page 161 of his book
34
that many Protestant scholars consider the book of Revelation non-
believable. Professor Ewald has produced powerful ARGUMENTs to
prove that the Gospel of John and the Epistles of John and the
Revelations of John cannot be the writings of the same person.
10 Eusebius makes the following statement in chapter 25 of vol.
7 of his history:
"Dionysius says that some ancient writers excluded the book
of Revelation from the Holy Scriptures and have completelv
refuted it. He said that this book is meaningless and a great
on page 206 of vol. 7: "Rose has written on page 161 of his book
34
that many Protestant scholars consider the book of Revelation non-
believable. Professor Ewald has produced powerful ARGUMENTs to
prove that the Gospel of John and the Epistles of John and the
Revelations of John cannot be the writings of the same person.
10 Eusebius makes the following statement in chapter 25 of vol.
7 of his history:
"Dionysius says that some ancient writers excluded the book
of Revelation from the Holy Scriptures and have completelv
refuted it. He said that this book is meaningless and a great