-
TheGreatDebateOrRevealingTheTruth, page : 121
"The first Epistle of Peter is genuine, but his second Epistle
should never be included in the Holy Scripture. Fourteen Epistles
of Paul are, however, read. The Epistle to the Hebrews has been
excluded by some people."
16 He further elaborates in chapter 25 of the same book:
"It has been a point of debate whether the Epistles to James,
and Jude, the second Epistle of Peter, and the Epistles of John I
and 11 were written by the Evangelists or some other writers of the
same names. It should be understood that the Acts of Paul, the
Revelation of Peter, the Epistle of Barnabas and the book entitled,
'The Institution of the Disciples" are rejected books and this can
be proved. The Revelation should also be included in this list."
17 Eusebius also quotes a statement of Origen concerning the
Epistle to the Hebrews in chapter 25 of vol. 6 of his book:
"It is a popular notion among the people that this Epistle
should never be included in the Holy Scripture. Fourteen Epistles
of Paul are, however, read. The Epistle to the Hebrews has been
excluded by some people."
16 He further elaborates in chapter 25 of the same book:
"It has been a point of debate whether the Epistles to James,
and Jude, the second Epistle of Peter, and the Epistles of John I
and 11 were written by the Evangelists or some other writers of the
same names. It should be understood that the Acts of Paul, the
Revelation of Peter, the Epistle of Barnabas and the book entitled,
'The Institution of the Disciples" are rejected books and this can
be proved. The Revelation should also be included in this list."
17 Eusebius also quotes a statement of Origen concerning the
Epistle to the Hebrews in chapter 25 of vol. 6 of his book:
"It is a popular notion among the people that this Epistle