-
TheGreatDebateOrRevealingTheTruth, page : 128
century. The Hebrew versions were believed to have been distorted
and the Greek translation was considered the accurate version.
Subsequently the position of these books was altogether changed.
The distorted version was acknowledged as accurate and the
accurate one as distorted.
31 The Book of Daniel in the Greek version was genuine in the
eyes of the early scholars, but after Origen declared that it was
incorrect, they rejected it and replaced it with the version of
Theodotion.
32 The Epistle of Aristias remained on the list of the Holy
Scriptures but in the seventeenth century some objections were
raised against it and suddenly it turned into a false document in
the eyes of a]l the Protestant scholars.
33 The Latin version is believed genuine by all the Catholics
while it is considered distorted and unbelievable by the
Protestants.
and the Greek translation was considered the accurate version.
Subsequently the position of these books was altogether changed.
The distorted version was acknowledged as accurate and the
accurate one as distorted.
31 The Book of Daniel in the Greek version was genuine in the
eyes of the early scholars, but after Origen declared that it was
incorrect, they rejected it and replaced it with the version of
Theodotion.
32 The Epistle of Aristias remained on the list of the Holy
Scriptures but in the seventeenth century some objections were
raised against it and suddenly it turned into a false document in
the eyes of a]l the Protestant scholars.
33 The Latin version is believed genuine by all the Catholics
while it is considered distorted and unbelievable by the
Protestants.